MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process.
Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects., This news data comes from:http://mdksxl.jyxingfa.com
“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”
Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”

Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
- DoTr seeks higher budget for 2026, requests P531B amid cuts
- Gasoline, diesel prices to increase again next week
- 'New' position being offered to Torre — Palace
- Discayas to file raps vs protesters, will attend Senate hearing — lawyer
- Marcos embarks on three-day state visit to Cambodia
- 13 massage therapists robbed, 2 cry rape
- Argentina hunts Nazi-looted painting revealed in property ad
- DILG denies allegations that PNP chief fired over firearms deal
- Read to reduce sentence, Uzbekistan tells prisoners
- NBI slaps Alice Guo, 35 Others with new graft, misconduct cases